<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buglist.net &#187; Omniture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buglist.net/category/omniture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buglist.net</link>
	<description>Unofficial Adobe Omniture buglist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:39:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dashboard scheduling</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2010/08/dashboard-scheduling/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2010/08/dashboard-scheduling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schedule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really really like the new dashboards in SiteCatalyst, it&#8217;s a major step forward for the dashboard functionality in the product. It is however still possible to find peculiarities here and there in the corners of the dashboards. Yesterday I got myself a Failed to schedule report error. After some testing I found the reason: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/failed_to_schedule_dashboard_report.png" alt="Failed to schedule dashboard report" title="Failed to schedule dashboard report" width="343" height="78" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1243" />I really really like the new dashboards in SiteCatalyst, it&#8217;s a major step forward for the dashboard functionality in the product.<br />
It is however still possible to find peculiarities here and there in the corners of the dashboards.</p>
<p>Yesterday I got myself a <strong>Failed to schedule report</strong> error.<br />
After some testing I found the reason: Don&#8217;t use a double quote as the first character of your Dashboard name, as this will effectively prevent you from setting up scheduled deliveries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2010/08/dashboard-scheduling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SiteCatalyst Report Settings</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2010/07/sitecatalyst-report-settings/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2010/07/sitecatalyst-report-settings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[setings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever noticed that some of the SiteCatalyst Report Settings appear to have a life of their own ? You know, You change a setting, and then later on, say late in the evening when you are working at home, the setting is suddenly back to where it was before you changed it, but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/my-account-report-settings.png" alt="My Account - Report Settings" title="My Account - Report Settings" width="172" height="194" class="size-full wp-image-1217 alignleft" /></a> Have you ever noticed that some of the SiteCatalyst Report Settings appear to have a life of their own ? You know, You change a setting, and then later on, say late in the evening when you are working at home, the setting is suddenly back to where it was before you changed it, <strong>but</strong> it doesn&#8217;t always happen when you change a setting.</p>
<p>I myself find it a bit annoying, so I started digging into what&#8217;s actually happening to those settings when you hit the Save button.<br />
The explanation is quite funny, only a few of the settings are actually saved in the way you would expect them to be saved, that is as properties tied to your login. Most of the settings are only stored locally on the computer you are currently using to change the settings.</p>
<p>The settings you can count on are :</p>
<ul>
<li>Include Calendar Events in Reports</li>
<li>Enable network acceleration for improved report performance </li>
<li>Currency</li>
<li>Scheduled Report Encoding</li>
</ul>
<p>The rest, you&#8217;ll have to adjust on every computer you use for SiteCatalyst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2010/07/sitecatalyst-report-settings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Discover on Ubuntu Linux</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2010/07/omniture-discover-on-ubuntu-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2010/07/omniture-discover-on-ubuntu-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 06:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me save you some time: It doesn&#8217;t work! Although the discover.jnlp (Java Web Start) file does indicate that Discover should be able to run on several Linux variants, well Ubuntu Linux isn&#8217;t one of these. The problem lies in the desktop manager, Omniture Discover is, as of now, not compatible with the Gnome desktop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me save you some time: It doesn&#8217;t work!<br />
Although the discover.jnlp (Java Web Start) file does indicate that Discover should be able to run on several Linux variants, well Ubuntu Linux isn&#8217;t one of these.<br />
The problem lies in the desktop manager, Omniture Discover is, as of now, not compatible with the Gnome desktop manager.</p>
<p><strong>Workarounds:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Switch to Kubuntu or some other NON-Gnome based Linux distro</li>
<li>Make your Ubuntu installation capable of running with the KDE desktop manager (sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2010/07/omniture-discover-on-ubuntu-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Maintenance Release, Mar 11</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2010/03/omniture-maintenance-release-mar-11/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2010/03/omniture-maintenance-release-mar-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Warehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time zone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another maintenance release from Omniture, this time with some great news/changes &#038; fixes. Most noticeable is a change in the way data feeds are being processed, they are now processed based on the timezone of the report suite instead of the data center timezone, for me, located in Denmark I guess this means a Data [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Maintenance_dude-272x300.gif" alt="Maintenance dude" title="Maintenance dude" width="272" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1195" />Another maintenance release from Omniture, this time with some great news/changes &#038; fixes.<br />
Most noticeable is a change in the way data feeds are being processed, they are now processed based on the timezone of the report suite instead of the data center timezone, for me, located in Denmark I guess this means a Data Warehouse request that includes yesterdays data will be able to start processing 9 hours earlier than it is today <img src='http://buglist.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Apart from the data feed news I think it&#8217;s great to see a sign of life from the Omniture Survey product, I&#8217;m not sure any active development is being done on the product, but at least they started fixing some of the issues with the current version, that being said, I still have a 560+ day old Survey issue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2010/03/omniture-maintenance-release-mar-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More about Omniture timezone handling</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2009/12/more-about-omniture-timezone-handling/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/12/more-about-omniture-timezone-handling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Warehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time zone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been writing about Omnitures way of dealing with timzones previously, since then a few changes has been made to both the SiteCatalyst and the Data Warehouse report scheduler. SiteCatalyst When setting the scheduling options in a report scheduled for later delivery in SiteCatalyst You&#8217;ll see a dialog box pretty much like this, notice the lack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been writing about Omnitures way of <a href="http://buglist.net/2009/04/time-zone-disorder/">dealing with timzones</a> previously, since then a few changes has been made to both the SiteCatalyst and the Data Warehouse report scheduler.</p>
<p><strong>SiteCatalyst</strong></p>
<p>When setting the scheduling options in a report scheduled for later delivery in SiteCatalyst You&#8217;ll see a dialog box pretty much like this, notice the lack off timezone indication next to the &#8220;Time of day&#8221; dropdown.</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_setup.png" rel="lightbox[1101]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1140" title="Setting up a new scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_setup-300x244.png" alt="Setting up a new scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" width="300" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>So what timezone is this? Is it Utah time? No, it&#8217;s in fact your local timezone, this will become obvious if you try editing an existing report, in this case you&#8217;ll see the timezone indicator next to the &#8220;Time of day&#8221; dropdown.</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_editing.png" rel="lightbox[1101]"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1150" title="Editing an existing scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/sitecatalyst_scheduled_report_editing-300x242.png" alt="Editing an existing scheduled report in Omniture SiteCatalyst" width="300" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>I know, no big deal, just confusing, especially for the new SiteCatalyst user.</p>
<p><strong>Data Warehouse</strong><br />
Schedule editing in Data Warehouse is not that different from SiteCatalyst, but there is one big difference you need to be aware about. Even though the dialog box shows you that things will execute at a certain time in your local timezone, this isn&#8217;t what really happens, everything in Data Warehouse happens at Pacific Standard Time (I think it is).<br />
Being located in Denmark as I am, this means that the earliest possible time at which I can get a Data Warehouse request to execute is 9 AM local Danish time if I need yesterdays data included in the report.</p>
<p><a href="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/data_warehouse_schedule_editing.png" rel="lightbox[1101]"><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/data_warehouse_schedule_editing-300x203.png" alt="Omniture Data Warehouse report schedule editing" title="Omniture Data Warehouse report schedule editing" width="300" height="203" class="size-medium wp-image-1158" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/12/more-about-omniture-timezone-handling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>customers.omniture.com</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2009/11/customers-omniture-com/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/11/customers-omniture-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=1050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago, on October 22, Omniture announced the availability of http://customers.omniture.com/. Early today on November 4. the site wasn&#8217;t very much available, as it went down together with Omniture Sitecatalyst. It&#8217;s hard to say precisely what went wrong, but my guess is that the loginsystem on customers.omniture.com shares some resources with the normal Omniture [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/burning-computer2-150x150.jpg" alt="burning computer" title="burning computer" width="150" height="150" class="size-thumbnail alignleft wp-image-1052" /> Some time ago, on October 22, Omniture announced the availability of <a href="http://customers.omniture.com/">http://customers.omniture.com/</a>.<br />
Early today on November 4. the site wasn&#8217;t very much available, as it went down together with Omniture Sitecatalyst. It&#8217;s hard to say precisely what went wrong, but my guess is that the loginsystem on customers.omniture.com shares some resources with the normal Omniture production environment. </p>
<p>One of the supposedly great features of customers.omniture.com is a System status grid where you can get updates on the current system status of the Omniture production environment, needless to say that for such a System status grid to be <strong>really</strong> smart, it has to be running even when everything else isn&#8217;t.<br />
Perhaps Omniture should make customers.omniture.com a bit more of a standalone system, without any ties to the rest of the Omniture network. I myself would probably even move the system to a location outside the Omniture network, this way customers.omniture.com could be available even in a situation where Omniture suffers from a complete network blackout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/11/customers-omniture-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Release Notes policy</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-release-notes-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-release-notes-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SiteCatalyst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I learned something new today. If a SiteCatalyst maintenance release doesn&#8217;t contain any new features the release notes are left out completely, despite the fact that a lot of issues have been fixed in the maintenance release. There is no official word from Omniture on why they do things this way. So why is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://buglist.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/see-hear-speak.png" alt="See Hear Speak no evil" title="See Hear Speak no evil" width="250" height="150" class="size-full wp-image-892 alignleft" />So, I learned something new today.<br />
If a SiteCatalyst maintenance release doesn&#8217;t contain any new features the release notes are left out completely, despite the fact that a lot of issues have been fixed in the maintenance release.<br />
There is no official word from Omniture on why they do things this way.<br />
So why is this such a big deal to me ?<br />
Well, creating a list of fixed issues would (I guess) be a pretty trivial task for Omniture to do, I do think Omniture is using Bugzilla internally, creating a list of closed/fixed issues between 2 dates in Bugzilla is done within minutes, granted, a skilled engineer would have to do some work on the output, but still, a few hours worth of work at Omniture could result in a nice and very thorough release note.<br />
A thorough release note could save me hours of work walking through tests etc, every time there is a maintenance release from Omniture, and unless I&#8217;m the only one with a long list of unresolved issues I guess a lot of other customers could benefit from such a release note as well.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: I should note however that Omniture Clientcare does the best they can to update the customers on any fixes and progress as soon as the information becomes available to Clientcare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/09/omniture-release-notes-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remember to report Your Omniture issues</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2009/07/remember-to-report-your-omniture-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/07/remember-to-report-your-omniture-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ClientCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Omniture ClientCare, the issues reported by the supported users are to a certain degree used when Omniture has to prioritize and decide what to include in the next Omniture suite maintenance release. So, do not count on that &#8220;someone else&#8221; will report the issue you just experienced, if it is bugging you, please [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Omniture ClientCare, the issues reported by the supported users are to a certain degree used when Omniture has to prioritize and decide what to include in the next Omniture suite maintenance release.<br />
So, do not count on that &#8220;someone else&#8221; will report the issue you just experienced, if it is bugging you, please pickup the phone and report it to ClientCare.<br />
Doing so, you&#8217;ll help not only yourself, but potentially everyone else with the same Omniture issue.</p>
<p>This is not something I&#8217;m making up myself in an attempt to flood ClientCare with phonecalls <img src='http://buglist.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
This is <a href="http://twitter.com/OmnitureCare/status/2783502476" title="@Schack Yes, everyone should submit issues affecting them at present. We're working on something cool to help streamline this. #omniture">information from Omniture.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/07/remember-to-report-your-omniture-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture documentation</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2009/06/omniture-documentation/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/06/omniture-documentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the many things about Omniture that makes a really nice first impression, is the amount of technical documentation available. It appears that everything has been documented in great detail. But, after some time you&#8217;ll probably realize that while the amount of documentation is impressive, the quality isn&#8217;t always equally impressive. So what&#8217;s the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the many things about Omniture that makes a really nice first impression, is the amount of technical documentation available. It appears that everything has been documented in great detail.<br />
But, after some time you&#8217;ll probably realize that while the amount of documentation is impressive, the quality isn&#8217;t always equally impressive.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the problem ?<br />
Well in many of the cases I&#8217;ve found myself it simply seems as if that the documentation hasn&#8217;t been able to keep up the pace, as the products and API&#8217;s have evolved.<br />
In other situations you won&#8217;t find the information where You would expect to find it, a lot of stuff ended up in the knowledge base instead of the documents where the information belongs.<br />
And finally, there are things that are completely undocumented.</p>
<p>Lets take a look at a few examples:</p>
<p>In <a href="http://developer.omniture.com/documentation/datainsert/understanding#Data_Insertion_Process">Understanding the Data Insertion API</a>, in the section about Data Insertion Mechanisms, the documentation says:<br />
<em>&#8220;The SiteCatalyst response to each data insertion includes a status message (SUCCESS or FAILURE).&#8221;</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s possible that&#8217;s the way things used to be, but it certainly is no more, now you&#8217;ll only get a status message in case of success, in case of failure you get no reply at all, and because of this, the accompanying <a href="http://developer.omniture.com/documentation/datainsert/examplecode">PHP Data Insertion sample kode</a> also ends up being a lot less useful than it could have been.</p>
<p>The section about <a href="http://developer.omniture.com/documentation/datainsert/understanding#Visitor_Information">Visitor Identification</a> completely fails to mention the fact that you can reuse data from the existing visitorID cookie set by Omniture in case you are running a 1. party cookie solution, and thereby making it really easy to mix Data Insertion API tracking with normal Javascript beacon tracking.</p>
<p>Omniture makes frequent updates to the core javascript tracking code, but both major and minor releases are made without any kind of release notes.</p>
<p>Even something as basic as the SiteCatalyst implementation guide contains some obvious goofs, I can&#8217;t help thinking: If obvious errors aren&#8217;t caught by the editor &#038; technical writers, wonder how many non-obvious errors the documentation contains ?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/06/omniture-documentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omniture Maintenance Release, May 15</title>
		<link>http://buglist.net/2009/05/omniture-maintenance-release-may-15/</link>
		<comments>http://buglist.net/2009/05/omniture-maintenance-release-may-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henrik Schack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Omniture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Warehouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buglist.net/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Omniture has fixed a few of the issues I&#8217;ve been mentioning here previously. The Conversion Classification editor problem has finally been fixed. Even though the fix isn&#8217;t mentioned in the release notes. The time zone confusion has been solved, or partly solved would probably be a more precise description, it has been fixed when setting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Omniture has fixed a few of the issues I&#8217;ve been mentioning here previously.</p>
<ul>
<li>The <a href="http://buglist.net/2009/03/conversion-classification-editor-trouble/">Conversion Classification editor problem</a> has finally been fixed. Even though the fix isn&#8217;t mentioned in the release notes.</li>
<li><a href="http://buglist.net/2009/04/time-zone-disorder/">The time zone confusion</a> has been solved, or partly solved would probably be a more precise description, it has been fixed when setting up reports in SiteCatalyst, but the issue persists when settings up Data Warehouse reports.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buglist.net/2009/05/omniture-maintenance-release-may-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: buglist.net @ 2010-09-06 11:14:21 -->